Home Home Donation About Us Galleries Repository Polls Interviews
  • Latest Comics

    • Getting Old
    • Geek Olympics 2008
    • Wacomless 4 Real
    • Gobobogo Goes to SDCC
    • San Diego Comic Con - Preparations
  • Vote for Normality Restored!

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    The Webcomic List

     

God help us!  Something serious!
◄ Previous | Next ►

God help us! Something serious!

January 3rd, 2008

I think we can all agree that, on the whole, this isn’t a place where we delve in too much serious discussion. Today, though, I do feel compelled to say a few words about the official beginning of the presidential election cycle. Why is today the official start? Because tonight, all across the “great” state of Iowa registered voters will gather together to caucus it up like it’s 1999…or 2008, I suppose.

What’s that? No caucus doesn’t mean that, pervey!

Basically, a bunch of Democrats from each of Iowa’s counties will get together in rooms and, I’m not exactly sure, shout at each other or something, until they decide who they support. The Republicans will do the same thing, though they’ll be in different rooms than the Democrats. At the end of the night we, the American voting public, will know who the new (or not new) front runners are for each party’s nomination.

Next Tuesday then brings us to the New Hampshire primary. This, of course, is much different than the Iowa caucus because it seems to be written in New Hampshire’s state constitution that at the age of 18 you MUST register as an independent.

Wins in either state can propel a candidate into the bigger primaries, such as Kerry’s 2004 victory in Iowa and McCain’s 2000 victory in New Hampshire.

Hey kilian, thanks for the civics lesson!

You’re welcome loyal 6 readers. But here’s the point of all this. I really believe that the 2008 election COULD be very important to this country. Now I say COULD because there is a small but strongly defiant part of me that is cynical enough to believe that it really doesn’t matter whose inaugural ball is going on just over one year from now since it seems increasingly clear that the two parties are on course to meld into one Uber-party about 15 years from now, but I digress.

On the whole, there are a lot of similar candidates with shades of difference. For instance, I whole heartedly agree with the PMJA staff’s assertion that Hillary and Giulianni are pretty much the same candidate (and, has anyone ever seen the two of them in the same room…think about it…).

Certainly, there exists the possibility that someone like Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich could get elected, but let’s be realistic folks. We’re really looking at six (possibly seven) viable candidates at this point; Hillary, Obama and Edwards on one side, Romney, Giuliani, McCain and (if you believe recent polls, which I don’t) Huckabee.

For those that don’t know, I’m a leftist. In fact, I’m a registered member of the Green Party. I don’t take that affiliation too seriously as I did, with much nose pinching, vote for Kerry four years ago. But I hate the idea of “independent” so I picked the party closest to my views. I point this out only so that you know from which direction I’m approaching the election cycle. While I certainly am curious to see how the Republican nomination shakes out (particularly in light of the fact that no “real” evangelical option is open to the right since, I’m telling you now, Huckabee won’t win the nomination and Romney is a mormon), I am much more interested in the Democratic nomination.

I think that Michael Moore breaks it down fairly well. All things considered, Edwards decision to use matching grants is perhaps the most telling thing that has gone on in this race. Whether it was a political ploy or not, no other candidate has yet done the same.

Of the three, I suppose I lean toward Edwards, though the lean is slight. I certainly don’t feel at all inclined to vote for Hillary. I’d vote for Bill again, were that an option, since he was so entertaining while in office. I can’t see Hillary bringing quite the same zest to the White House though. Plus, I’m pretty sure that if she and Giuliani aren’t, actually, the same person, then she must be a Nazi-robot who traveled through time.

Something about Obama doesn’t sit right with me. He seems good, but for all his “supposed” charisma, I never find myself swayed by him. Plus, I think that if he were to win the nomination, and the election, he would be assassinated within three months of taking office. I just think it’ll happen. 2008 or not, there are a lot of a-holes still out there.

So I guess, by default, that leaves me with Edwards. My wife is high on him, and she’s usually got a better moral compass than myself. But I guess I’m just too tired of being stuck with the “least evil” option. I guess on some level that in our current society anyone who would actively desire/campaign to become president is untrustworthy by default.

Kilian - Icon

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 3rd, 2008 at 11:06 am and is filed under Politico, Post, World News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

^ 9 Comments...

  1. gilgrim
    January 3rd, 2008 at 12:42 pm

    The Uber party is not scheduled for 15 yrs from now, it already happened at least 15 years ago… 1 party 2 factions as the saying goes, and more and more these jokers are crossing over between the ‘ideals and interests’ of what separates them supposedly.

    For those what care, I’m actually a Libertarian, and no that does not mean that I’m automatically up for embibing the Ron Paul kool-aid, I have some fundamental disagreements with the man and his Dr. Jekyll persona of Libertine and neo-con.

    As for the party with the only mascot featured in a Mexican stage-trans-species-sex-show, I’ve lived in a socialist country for long enough to know that anything even remotely approaching such a tact is not going to be good in the long run.

    But then again, don’t look at me for your political views, I think I might be throwing myself into the lead for NR crazy person with the pointy hat by admitting that I love the DisInformation Company, and watching both Zeitgeist and EndGame has only inspired me to (paradoxically to my presence here) stay off the radar from our Orwellian Masters…

    But enough from the local crazy — what say ye’ good folk of NR???

  2. Spookymuffin
    January 3rd, 2008 at 5:03 pm

    WEll as I am only 16 and can’t vote I try not to fill my head with it all. I like to spend the freedom of youth on other issues…..yay

  3. exsulis
    January 3rd, 2008 at 8:19 pm

    Woot, Voting!! Oh wait that means I have to do jury Duty(shudder) again. Guess I could vote for John Stewart this year. :)

    As for the whole ubre party I don’t see it happening with either of the two parties merging. Lets face it calling a Democrat a conservative Republican is pretty close to calling them the devil, and it goes the other way as well. I could however see libertarians absorbing said parties to form the Ubre party of doom.

    On the Dems side I’m kinda Okay with Obama, and Edwards which is at odds with my fascist nature, and I really dispise the current Pubs nominations. Which again leads me to which candidate do I hate the least. Which not very shockingly is John Stewart who I regularly enjoy watching.

    Moore made some good points but 85% of the stuff that comes out of his mouth is usually conservative hating propoganda. Which is one thing that really pushes my button. Its not like he doesn’t have points but he lays out his opinions as facts.

    There really could not be a worse candidate in my opinion than Hillary. I know a lot of people like her because she is A) a woman B) for the little guy C )married to Bill. I’m not saying he isn’t qualified to do the job but its more of a trust issue with her. Even Moore nailed a few of the hundred or so actions that I really find disconcerting. Where I don’t think she has a chance is the number of people who hate her for being a) a woman b) Bill’s wife c) not a man d) a big C lap dog. Its more to the point of there are a boat load of nuts out there for the first three little reasons which have less impact on her to being able to the job compared to actually political reasoning.

    Obama for the same reasons as Moore mentioned worries me. BUT unlike the other nominations he is closer to being more of the middle road than the others(Dems side). He isn’t lets kick the big guys out of the government. Which can be a problem depending on which side of the boat you are on. While he in fact does support the troops in oversea deployments he also wants to pull them back but isn’t going withdraw them until the area is secure. I see his point of view it has more to do with saving international face, and trying to maintain THAT region in a semi decent state. We’re there, not much we can do about that now. Unless you want the middle east to totally go to pot. His stand on this is one point of contention for some poeple, and I’m not saying he has the best plan but there are other factors in military deployments. Like Hillary he does have an uphill battle from being part of a minority. For some reason poor AA’s really dislike AA’s who have made a decent amount of money, and then the same nuts who hate Hillary for being a woman will likely come out of the woodwork against him as well.

    Finally we get to my final guess who will be up on the Dems side: Edwards. He is that southern soulman. Sure, its one thing to go against the Big corps but you have to remember that the US economy is pushed along by corperations who want to make money. Killing them will hurt the US economy there is just no way around that. He seems too much like and Idealist without thinking about some of the consequences. I’m not saying we shouldn’t do some real trust busting. The last 16 years has just been plain dumb with the number of monoplies that have been born, and grown. Back on track, eight years ago he wasn’t that against getting money from the big guys. It goes to show how some politicians change over the course of their lives. In theory his health care plan does look the best of all the health care reforms currently on the table. Edwards has the best change of not getting the nuts to come out of nowhere just becase he isn’t a woman, or black.

    Unfortunately, I have issues with these three for the same reasons. Like should we say okay, and forgive everyone who took too many loans, and couldn’t pay them? Hell no!! If you’re old enough to get a loan it means your an adult, and you shouldn’t be begging the Government to get you out of a jam like your parents did when you were five. The government isn’t our parents its there to protect us from the big bad companies, making sure goods that are available to the public are safe, and international threats. End of story. It isn’t here to make sure we didn’t blow all our money on candy so we don’t have anything left when we want to relax, and do nothing. Its a mistake that we should have to deal with, and not our neighbors who put some money away for a rainy day.

    I could go on but I don’t like to rant.

    Which leaves me with the following order for possible votes:

    John Stewart
    Steven Colbert
    Obama
    Edwards

    Hold on Hlllary isn’t some kind of killer Nazi-robot? Why doesn’t anyone tell me these things!

  4. Tengu
    January 3rd, 2008 at 8:20 pm

    Hmm, Huckabee is endorsed by Chuck Norris, so that intrigues me. I have enjoyed what Ron Paul has been saying during his campaign, but something just doesn’t jive well with me about that man. If I could I would have voted for Steven Colbert (a man that gets sponsored by Doritos can’t be all that bad, can he?).

  5. exsulis
    January 3rd, 2008 at 8:37 pm

    And some Chuck Norris factoids just because they are gold:

    If you have five dollars and Chuck Norris has five dollars, Chuck Norris has more money than you.
    There is no ‘ctrl’ button on Chuck Norris’s computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.
    Apple pays Chuck Norris 99 cents every time he listens to a song.
    Chuck Norris can sneeze with his eyes open.
    Chuck Norris can eat just one Lay’s potato chip.
    Chuck Norris is suing Myspace for taking the name of what he calls everything around you.
    Chuck Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird.

  6. c
    January 3rd, 2008 at 9:12 pm

    i cant say i am impressed with any of the puppets on the left or on the right side of the puppeteers.

  7. Kerri
    January 3rd, 2008 at 10:29 pm

    It’s said that in every presidential run, Elvis gets at least a million votes. It’s looking more and more sensible as the years go by.

    I’m not very political myself, but I’ll say I don’t think Obama has enough experience and that if Hillary really wants to sell the product, as it were, she needs to find a second and possibly third alternate facial expression. As Democratic as I am, I actually sort of like McCain because he’s not afraid of doing his own thing, no matter how un-Republican it is.

    Mostly I just want the stupid and pointless war to end, for old people and kids to get the health care they deserve, and for someone to end the stem-cell question one way or another.

    Oh. I also want a pony.

  8. gilgrim
    January 4th, 2008 at 10:10 am

    exsulis sold me on 2 candidates right away - I would vote for them today if given the chance…

    John Stewart
    Steven Colbert

    And thus our country would be saved and the multiverse would see fit to unleash French Bulldog puppies riding the backs of unicorns and everyone could have one. The world would be a better place.

  9. Iowa: The Recap, or A response to the responses... | Normality Restored
    January 4th, 2008 at 11:21 am

    [...] Restored « HOME | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE « Previous | January 4th, [...]

) Your Reply...

  • So It Is Written

    Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before… He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. — Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle

  • BUY GILGRIM A WACOM!


    Donation Big Board

    • Goal: $450.00
    • Current Total: $203.01
  • Gilgrim's Tweeter

  • Comments Anyone?

    • kilian on What is it you’re not supposed to talk about?
    • c on What is it you’re not supposed to talk about?
    • Spookymuffin on I am a swimming in, how do you say, books.
    • c on What is it you’re not supposed to talk about?
    • Jezmon_degyte on I am a swimming in, how do you say, books.
    • Tengu on My fingers have started to fall off.
  • Who Loves Normality?

    Your loyal reader hall of fame!
    1. Tengu (184)
    2. Kerri (148)
    3. Spookymuffin (96)
    4. c (66)
    5. CountBl00d (43)
    6. APrilhead (37)
    7. Jezmon_degyte (19)
    8. unknown_suavo (10)
    9. Mojo (7)
    10. Shalyn (7)
    11. Blackrose2592 (4)
    12. Holly Won't (3)
  • Miscellaneous Links

    • Deceiver
    • Ectoplasmosis!
    • Fabulist!
    • Gilgrim’s Blathering’s
    • My Trickster Forum
    • NR on Facebook
    • Official NR (gilgrim) Twitter Feed
    • Poor Mojo Newswire
    • Yahtzee’s Fully Ramblomatic
  • Print Comic Related Links

    • SLG Publishing
    • The Savage Critic(s)
  • Webcomic Related Links

    • FreakAngels
    • Good Ship Chronicles
    • HalfPixel dot com
    • Joe Loves Crappy Movies
    • Monster Gummi Bear
    • Octopus Pie!
    • Penny Arcade
    • The Adventures of Dr. McNinja
    • The Perry Bible Fellowship
    • The Phoenix Requiem
    • VG Cats
    • xkcd
    • Your Webcomic is Bad…
  • Writing and Author Related Links

    • Neil Gaiman dot com
    • Subterranean Press
    • The Works of James P Blaylock
    • The Works of Tim Powers
    • Warren Ellis dot com
  • Nothing to See Here

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org

Normality Restored is powered by WordPress with ComicPress. Subscribe RSS: Entries | Comments