You’d think…I mean, really, you’d think that the literary executor for Norman Mailer wouldn’t be A) a moron, or B) a total asshat. But when you make a statement like, “Vonnegut was the American Mark Twain,” there are very few ways to adequately describe what a complete and total retard you are.
Of course, he might have really said that “Vonnegut was the modern Mark Twain,” and he was merely misquoted. But then that means that the Washington Post is employing reporters who are so lacking in mental faculties that they will type out a statement like that above and not think that, possibly, it was a misquote…
Mostly the article is a discussion of reasons for Vonnegut’s greater sales record, particularly in the near past, than Mailer or William Styron. And the reasoning is fairly valid; Vonnegut was always seen as a little more “counter” than the other two (he never did win a Pulitzer), his books were by and large much smaller in length, and the general tone of his writing was more conversational.
Let me say that, on some level, I agree with those claims.
But by making them in the way he did, the writer is also saying that Vonnegut’s greater sales couldn’t be that he was, you know, the best writer of the bunch. God forbid a science fiction writer actually be better at the craft than a “literary” type.
God damnit! I’m getting more upset the more I type…fuck you Washington Post!
But even worse than the Washington Post and their backhanded dig at Vonnegut is Dana Gioia’s (head of the National Endowment for the Arts, a group that is simultaneously very important and also full of its own shit( comment…
“First of all, Vonnegut’s funny, and humor has a broad appeal,” Gioia says. “Secondly, he worked in genres like science fiction and political satire that have an enormous appeal to boys, and boys are the ones usually reading Mailer and Vonnegut and those authors. … Vonnegut was a very open and inviting author, less conspicuously literary than Mailer or Styron, although clearly a fine writer in his own way.”
Clearly a fine writer in his own way…
What the hell is that? Obviously, if a writer uses humor, science fiction, satire, and actually tries to connect with his readers (as opposed to, say, condescend to them) then he can’t be taken as seriously as someone like Norman Mailer.
